As we progress on our studies of the Presocratics, I am starting to see a deviation from the traditional thinking of the greeks. Homer presents us with gods who are human like and to some extent mundane, that do the same things as humans. I have a feeling that the Milesians' quest for an arche based on matter, physical things that are unique and "pure" like the water, air, and infinity, reflects the search for an origin different than the Homeric gods. An origin that is different from the human nature, savage and mundane.
According to A Presocratic Reader, Xenophanes rejected the Homeric Olympian gods. Although the book suggests that it is unclear if he agreed on one god or a god superior to all gods, he is the first philosopher to suggest a non-anthropomorfic god. A god that is unique for itself. Was he inspired by Anaximander's principle of the apeiron, that which is the boundless and mystical? I feel the he was indeed, because Anaximander's principle is the only non visible matter, compared to water and air, beyond human immediate perception. This is the same material that Xenphanes' god is made of.
Xenophanes is a reformer in the sense that he introduced this god that looks different from the mythological gods because they were human like. To reinforce his view, Xenophanes believed that humans cannot ask questions an be certain of their answers. Xenophanes did not believe in "sure knowledge". He supported that human should be satisfied with "belief" or "opinion". I really like this because this reminds me of the definition that most of us gave to philosophy on our first day of class. We said that in philosophy we are not certain of what the true answer is, but what counts is the different answers people provide to one question.
Reading about Xenophanes showed me that we are starting to perceive a new way of thinking in the history of the beginning philosophy. Xenophanes represents a touch of originality, maybe the start of a philosophy that shapes the philosophy we like to relate to nowadays.
According to A Presocratic Reader, Xenophanes rejected the Homeric Olympian gods. Although the book suggests that it is unclear if he agreed on one god or a god superior to all gods, he is the first philosopher to suggest a non-anthropomorfic god. A god that is unique for itself. Was he inspired by Anaximander's principle of the apeiron, that which is the boundless and mystical? I feel the he was indeed, because Anaximander's principle is the only non visible matter, compared to water and air, beyond human immediate perception. This is the same material that Xenphanes' god is made of.
Xenophanes is a reformer in the sense that he introduced this god that looks different from the mythological gods because they were human like. To reinforce his view, Xenophanes believed that humans cannot ask questions an be certain of their answers. Xenophanes did not believe in "sure knowledge". He supported that human should be satisfied with "belief" or "opinion". I really like this because this reminds me of the definition that most of us gave to philosophy on our first day of class. We said that in philosophy we are not certain of what the true answer is, but what counts is the different answers people provide to one question.
Reading about Xenophanes showed me that we are starting to perceive a new way of thinking in the history of the beginning philosophy. Xenophanes represents a touch of originality, maybe the start of a philosophy that shapes the philosophy we like to relate to nowadays.
I agree. He shows how new thoughts emerge in any particular cave.
ReplyDelete