Skip to main content

"the beginning of great intellectual adventure" - Curd

After our class discussion yesterday, suggesting that ancient classical philosophy emerged from the mytho-poetic traditions of the ancient world has provided me with an opinion and an idea that I was able to apply to the world today. Let me explain more…

The stories that arise from the mytho-poetic literature served as stimuli for the first philosophers to see themselves, their values and actions, being reflected in such stories. By ancient philosophers perceiving what was sublime in the stories they were able to identify the topics heroism, mysticism, obedience, etc. and were able to make them the hallmarks of their society by the constantly questioning. This is supported by what Patricia Curd’s Introduction to her book “A Presocratics Reader” mentions. She explains that the Presocratics did not see physics, math, engineering, art, philosophy, etc. as separate. Them not divide the knowledge perceived, tells us that it all the knowledge most have come from one source and then eventually they were differentiated to give birth to the different fields that we now know. That unifying beginning was therefore important for the development of the different fields. The mythopoetic tradition provided this necessary unification.

I feel that the ancient philosophers just taught us a lesson. They teach us that if we want to be able to start a tradition of inquiry for ourselves, we must be able to analyze what is in front of our eyes. Find that unifying point to get the whole picture. What is in front of our eyes now? It frequently is the media. Just as the ancient philosophers did, they started to search for a reflection of their values in their mytho-poetic stories and this triggered their reflective and examining nature that the mind innately has. Our society urgently needs the philosophy that can arise from reflecting on our current traditions.


There is lot to learn from philosophy even from its birth itself.

Comments

  1. Anne-Marie SchultzJanuary 16, 2017 at 6:20 PM

    I like that way of putting it, stimuli to see ourselves. that is pretty much philosophy for me. I totally agree that philosophy is an urgent need.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The way of the Truth

Parmenides differs from the rest of the pre-socratics previously studied (the Milesians, Xenophanes, Heraclitus and Pythagoras) in that his thought transcend the material into the abstract, asking questions about our existence and reality, essentially a start to the arena of metaphysics. Parmenides  is an example of the way we should elevate our minds into the abstract. It is an invitation to live in a more contemplative way, contemplating using logic and reasoning. Through his poem and the imagery of roads and paths, he describes our reality as having two ways the way of the Truth and the way of Opinion. The way of the Truth is the road less traveled by regular people, they go for the way of Opinion. The way of Opinion is based on the experiences that we live day to day, what we see right in front of our eyes. The way of the Truth is the one you want to be in to live well. To live in this way you have to understand the concepts of the "what is" and "what is not"....
2 comments
Read more

Aristotle- The Politics Book 1

The Politics is a book dedicated to concepts of state, political communities. Aristotle starts his writing by defining state as a community of communities. All communities  aim for a good. The state is the largest community and embraces the rest. Because of this relationship, it aims at a deeper and larger good. Aristotle debunks the qualifications and conceptions people have for rulers of a certain community (king, statesman, householder, master). The mistake he identifies is people differentiating between rulers by the number of their subjects. Aristotle suggests politics should not be viewed this way but rather as a compound composed of elements. This statement sets the tone for book 1. His mission now is to reveal these elements.  According to Aristotle, looking at the origin will reveal "the clearest view" of the essence of a state. Family is first elements identified. Family is the union of people, starting with that of man and woman, who need each...
Post a Comment
Read more

Eye for an Eye- Book 1 of The Republic of Plato

The first section of Book 1 was really interesting. Specially because I enjoyed the way Socrates has conversations with people, questioning everything they say and hence making them reflect about what they just said. This is an example of how dialoguing can help you create new ways of thinking. I will write about the first two conversations he has. The first one with the respectable Cephalus.  The talk between Socrates and Cephalus reminded me of the talks my parents and I have before I come back to college after a break. Socrates, thought, is clearly more willing to ask questions to the elders than I normally am. Socrates eagerly, with a tone of respect, wants to know how Cephalus directs his life. Socrates learns from the wisdom of an old man.   It is interesting because it reminded me of Plato’s Pheado where Socrates is summing up his life moments before dying in the presence of other philosophers. This is a foreshadowing of what he will do when its close to his last m...
1 comment
Read more