Skip to main content

"the beginning of great intellectual adventure" - Curd

After our class discussion yesterday, suggesting that ancient classical philosophy emerged from the mytho-poetic traditions of the ancient world has provided me with an opinion and an idea that I was able to apply to the world today. Let me explain more…

The stories that arise from the mytho-poetic literature served as stimuli for the first philosophers to see themselves, their values and actions, being reflected in such stories. By ancient philosophers perceiving what was sublime in the stories they were able to identify the topics heroism, mysticism, obedience, etc. and were able to make them the hallmarks of their society by the constantly questioning. This is supported by what Patricia Curd’s Introduction to her book “A Presocratics Reader” mentions. She explains that the Presocratics did not see physics, math, engineering, art, philosophy, etc. as separate. Them not divide the knowledge perceived, tells us that it all the knowledge most have come from one source and then eventually they were differentiated to give birth to the different fields that we now know. That unifying beginning was therefore important for the development of the different fields. The mythopoetic tradition provided this necessary unification.

I feel that the ancient philosophers just taught us a lesson. They teach us that if we want to be able to start a tradition of inquiry for ourselves, we must be able to analyze what is in front of our eyes. Find that unifying point to get the whole picture. What is in front of our eyes now? It frequently is the media. Just as the ancient philosophers did, they started to search for a reflection of their values in their mytho-poetic stories and this triggered their reflective and examining nature that the mind innately has. Our society urgently needs the philosophy that can arise from reflecting on our current traditions.


There is lot to learn from philosophy even from its birth itself.

Comments

  1. Anne-Marie SchultzJanuary 16, 2017 at 6:20 PM

    I like that way of putting it, stimuli to see ourselves. that is pretty much philosophy for me. I totally agree that philosophy is an urgent need.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Xenophanes a Reformer?

As we progress on our studies of the Presocratics, I am starting to see a deviation from the traditional thinking of the greeks. Homer presents us with gods who are human like and to some extent mundane, that do the same things as humans. I have a feeling that the Milesians' quest for an arche  based on matter, physical things that are unique and "pure" like the water, air, and infinity, reflects the search for an origin different than the Homeric gods. An origin that is different from the human nature, savage and mundane. According to A Presocratic Reader , Xenophanes rejected the Homeric Olympian gods. Although the book suggests that it is unclear if he agreed on one god or a god superior to all gods, he is the first philosopher to suggest a non-anthropomorfic god. A god that is unique for itself. Was he inspired by Anaximander's principle of the apeiron, that which is the boundless and mystical? I feel the he was indeed, because Anaximander's principle is the...
1 comment
Read more

What we value, truth or knowledge?

Last time I ended class with this thought: Xenophanes changed the Homeric views on god. It helps us question if religions define god for what it truly is. With the progression of their theories, I see the Milesians and Xenophanes and think that maybe the mind needs to be constantly evolving to get closer to the truth. Reading Pythagoras made me think about the relationship between truth and knowledge. Curd shows us a fragment were Plato makes a parallel between Homer and Pythagoras. They look alike in the fact that they both had people that followed them. The major distinction is Pythagoras striving for knowledge, his followers the mathematikoi and akousmatikoi both looking to gain knowledge in what they each venerated, while Homer convinced his followers by   his stories that reflected some of the truth about their society.   Curd mentions this fragment “Much learning does not teach insight. Otherwise it would have taught Hesiod and Pythagoras and moreover Xenphane...
2 comments
Read more

Aristotle- The Politics Book 1

The Politics is a book dedicated to concepts of state, political communities. Aristotle starts his writing by defining state as a community of communities. All communities  aim for a good. The state is the largest community and embraces the rest. Because of this relationship, it aims at a deeper and larger good. Aristotle debunks the qualifications and conceptions people have for rulers of a certain community (king, statesman, householder, master). The mistake he identifies is people differentiating between rulers by the number of their subjects. Aristotle suggests politics should not be viewed this way but rather as a compound composed of elements. This statement sets the tone for book 1. His mission now is to reveal these elements.  According to Aristotle, looking at the origin will reveal "the clearest view" of the essence of a state. Family is first elements identified. Family is the union of people, starting with that of man and woman, who need each...
Post a Comment
Read more