Skip to main content

Dreamers Asleep

Reading Heraclitus of Ephesus adds to my questions on the relationship between truth and knowledge. At end of last post and by the comments, it is clear that sometimes knowledge cannot get us to the truth. Knowledge without insight is not enough if the truth is wanting to be found. Today's philosopher says this and he calls people who gain knowledge with no insight a bunch of... dreamers asleep, to put it in nice words. 

Heraclitus is saying that we are able to gain the knowledge and truth at the same time only by having insight, bridging the gap between the divine knowledge and human knowledge that Homer opened or aggravated. Heraclitus uses the word logos to describe what he believes in. Curd defines Heraclitus' logos as the "objective and independent truth available to all." We all have the capacity to gain this independent truth but only through insight. Curd is really clear at stating that this insight is not just the inquiry aspect but the "understanding how all things form a unity". 

To sum up Heraclitus: We are a bunch of dreamers asleep if we just gain knowledge without insight. The world is made of independent truths, logos, that can be gained through inquiry but most importantly profundity of insight by identifying that all things form a unity. He explains the unity of things through paradoxes which result to be powerful because it gives logos an unchanging characteristic in the midst of a changing cosmos. 

How can I apply Heraclitus contribution to philosophy to todays world? Easy. How many people do we hear saying that they have nothing to do with our political situation today? How many students go to class to copy down material in their notebooks and not question the logic behind what they are writing? How many things happen behind our backs that we never have identified before? 

A question I have for Heraclitus is: what type of truth will his doctrine of unity of all things bring us to? Can there just be one truth or multiple? We know that Heraclitus' logos is unchanging in the midst of a changing cosmos. Maybe the truth can only be one then. Is this what we need in these times of discrimination and war to show people that although we are all separate we are unified by one truth?

The image to the right is Sanzio's depiction of Heraclitus, aka "the weeping" philosopher. He is seating away from the rest of the philosophers at a meeting. To me he seems asleep, but hopefully not being a dreamer asleep! He is actually being depicted as showing melancholy for humanity. I thought it was interesting to see the way art characterizes him, to some extent to show the way his doctrine impacts him personally, weeping for humanity and maybe those people who cannot grasp logos or are ignorant of the unity that all things form. 




Comments

  1. Anne-Marie SchultzJanuary 26, 2017 at 11:05 AM

    That is a really, really good question. Do we still have access to Heraclitus' truth.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle- The Politics Book 1

The Politics is a book dedicated to concepts of state, political communities. Aristotle starts his writing by defining state as a community of communities. All communities  aim for a good. The state is the largest community and embraces the rest. Because of this relationship, it aims at a deeper and larger good. Aristotle debunks the qualifications and conceptions people have for rulers of a certain community (king, statesman, householder, master). The mistake he identifies is people differentiating between rulers by the number of their subjects. Aristotle suggests politics should not be viewed this way but rather as a compound composed of elements. This statement sets the tone for book 1. His mission now is to reveal these elements.  According to Aristotle, looking at the origin will reveal "the clearest view" of the essence of a state. Family is first elements identified. Family is the union of people, starting with that of man and woman, who need each...
Post a Comment
Read more

Xenophanes a Reformer?

As we progress on our studies of the Presocratics, I am starting to see a deviation from the traditional thinking of the greeks. Homer presents us with gods who are human like and to some extent mundane, that do the same things as humans. I have a feeling that the Milesians' quest for an arche  based on matter, physical things that are unique and "pure" like the water, air, and infinity, reflects the search for an origin different than the Homeric gods. An origin that is different from the human nature, savage and mundane. According to A Presocratic Reader , Xenophanes rejected the Homeric Olympian gods. Although the book suggests that it is unclear if he agreed on one god or a god superior to all gods, he is the first philosopher to suggest a non-anthropomorfic god. A god that is unique for itself. Was he inspired by Anaximander's principle of the apeiron, that which is the boundless and mystical? I feel the he was indeed, because Anaximander's principle is the...
1 comment
Read more

The Republic- Book 3

Book III starts by exploring the concept of courage. The idea of the Gods for the Athenians is something that is bothering Plato. His main concern is if the traditional way of thinking about the Gods is fostering real virtues of courage.   This dialogue makes us understand the importance of questioning the consequences of things that we hear or read. Socrates questions Homeric writing “ It’s not that they are not poetic and sweet for the many to hear, but the more poetic they are, the less should they be heard by boys and men who must be free and accustomed to fearing slavery more than death.” (387b) It seems then that the media is that shapes what we ought to fear and we ought not to fear. This is interesting because I am currently taking a class where we are talking about End of Life and how currently the media has distorted our perception of death. If an alien were to land on earth and tried to understand the concept of human death and got his first glance from a TV news fe...
Post a Comment
Read more